Data model / schema · 6.0.0 schema · delivered project

Pistoia Alliance Unified Data Model

Maintained by Pistoia Alliance · subsequent community maintenance unverified

What it helps you do

Use UDM when you need xML exchange of experimental information about compound synthesis, reactions, products, procedures, measurements, and compound testing.

  • Discovery
  • Laboratory
PlanAcquireHarmonizeExchangeLearn + reuse

01

Where it fits—and where it doesn’t

Use these four checks before committing implementation time.

Use it when
Cross-system exchange of medicinal-chemistry synthesis and testing records that are not covered by instrument-only or generic study metadata.
Do not use it as
Do not treat UDM as a complete solution on its own. The public repository has no packaged releases and showed no verified maintenance after 2021. Current adoption, extension governance, validator support, and successor plans are unverified.
Best for
Teams working with Discovery and Laboratory data across Acquire → Harmonize → Exchange.
Maturity
EmergingPromising but still emerging; use a bounded pilot and plan for change.

02

See it in the workflow

A standard creates value by changing a handoff, not by existing in a catalog.

  1. InputWhat starts

    Discovery and Laboratory data, metadata, and the local decisions around them

  2. UDMWhat changes

    UDM applies a shared data model / schema across Acquire → Harmonize → Exchange

  3. OutputWhat becomes possible

    A more consistent, reviewable handoff for the next system or team

Readiness gateBefore scaling: The public repository has no packaged releases and showed no verified maintenance after 2021. Current adoption, extension governance, validator support, and successor plans are unverified.

03

A concrete example

A chemistry platform exports a UDM 6.0.0 reaction record with structures, participants, procedure, conditions, products, yields, analytical results, identifiers, and source-system provenance.

Why it matters: Structured synthesis and testing records can support reaction and property models, but normalization, failed experiments, analytical evidence, and selection-bias controls remain separate.

04

What it fits with

Complements Allotrope or AnIML instrument results and ISA study context; chemistry identifiers, units, vocabularies, and organization-specific extensions still need governance.

05

Implementation starter

Start with one bounded handoff. Pin, test, and review it before scaling.

  1. Name an accountable owner and the decision UDM must support.

  2. Pin the exact version and companion artifacts: 6.0.0 schema · delivered project.

  3. Map one representative input to the required data model / schema artifacts.

  4. Test the result against the canonical source and record every exception.

  5. Preserve the source data, mappings, and review evidence before scaling.

06

Limitation to test first—and the tests that catch it

Risk

The public repository has no packaged releases and showed no verified maintenance after 2021. Current adoption, extension governance, validator support, and successor plans are unverified.

Test

Run one representative end-to-end pilot and record exactly where UDM loses context, needs an extension, or depends on another standard.

Risk

A structured or machine-readable result can still be unfit for analysis or AI.

Test

Test the output for missing context, provenance, terminology alignment, time leakage, and the intended downstream decision. Structured synthesis and testing records can support reaction and property models, but normalization, failed experiments, analytical evidence, and selection-bias controls remain separate.

07

Why we believe this

Checked against the canonical source, with knowledge-base analysis clearly separated from publisher claims.

Evidence notation: E1 + E4. The code is shorthand; the plain-language statement above is the claim.

Formal status
Open 6.0.0 schema; current maintenance and adoption unverified
Confidence
Medium
Review state
Source-checked · watch
Reviewed by
Chemistry experiment-data reviewer
Last verified
13 July 2026
Review again when
Repository activity, successor governance, validator, implementation, or Pistoia status update
How the evidence method works

08

Source shelf

Official diagrams, examples, specifications, and explainers. Nothing external loads until you choose to open it.

  • Primary source6.0.0 schema · delivered project

    Pistoia Alliance UDM repository

    The canonical publisher or steward source used to verify this data model / schema profile.

    Publisher
    Pistoia Alliance · subsequent community maintenance unverified
    Rights
    Rights remain with the publisher; this knowledge base links to the source rather than copying it.
    Access
    Opens the publisher's source in a new tab; no external media loads on this page.
    Verified
    2026-07-13
    Open at source

Next action

Put this profile in context

Compare its role with adjacent standards or place it inside an end-to-end data pathway before choosing an implementation.