Data model / schema · Public repository tag v8.2.2 · 2025-02-27

Sentinel Common Data Model

Maintained by Sentinel Operations Center · FDA Sentinel Initiative

What it helps you do

Sentinel CDM supports nineteen linked tables supporting standardized queries over enrollment, encounters, diagnoses, procedures, dispensing, prescribing, laboratory, death, patient-reported, and feature-engineering data.

  • Real-world evidence
  • Regulatory
PlanAcquireHarmonizeExchangeLearn + reuse

01

Where it fits and where it does not

Use these four checks before committing implementation time.

Use it when
FDA-style distributed active surveillance of drugs, biologics, devices, and vaccines using partner-held healthcare data.
Limits
The public repository’s latest tag is v8.2.2 while the landing page still names v8.1.0 and v8.2.0 concurrently; the current partner deployment mix is not publicly verified.
Best for
Real-world evidence and Regulatory teams working across Harmonize → Learn + reuse.
Maturity
EstablishedSuitable for production assessment. Pin the exact release and any implementation profile.

02

See it in the workflow

This view shows the input, the change the standard introduces, and the resulting output.

  1. InputWhat starts

    Real-world evidence and Regulatory source data, metadata, and local mappings

  2. Sentinel CDMWhat changes

    Use Sentinel CDM as a pinned data model / schema across Harmonize → Learn + reuse

  3. OutputWhat becomes possible

    A handoff the next system or team can validate against the same release

Readiness gateThe public repository’s latest tag is v8.2.2 while the landing page still names v8.1.0 and v8.2.0 concurrently; the current partner deployment mix is not publicly verified.

03

A concrete example

A data partner maps claims and clinical sources into the pinned SCDM, passes Sentinel quality review, and runs centrally distributed surveillance programs locally.

Why it matters: The distributed model supports reproducible safety features, but portability, labeling, site shift, privacy, and algorithm execution must follow Sentinel governance.

04

What it fits with

Shares source code systems with other RWD models but is optimized for Sentinel tools and surveillance workflows rather than general OMOP or PCORnet analytics.

05

Implementation starter

Start with one bounded handoff. Pin, test, and review it before scaling.

  1. Define one handoff, its accountable owner, and the decision Sentinel CDM must support.

  2. Pin the exact version and companion artifacts: Public repository tag v8.2.2 · 2025-02-27.

  3. Map one representative input to the required data model / schema artifacts.

  4. Test the result against the canonical source and record every exception.

  5. Preserve the source data, mappings, and review evidence before scaling.

06

Test the main limitation

Risk

The public repository’s latest tag is v8.2.2 while the landing page still names v8.1.0 and v8.2.0 concurrently; the current partner deployment mix is not publicly verified.

Test

Run one representative end-to-end pilot and record exactly where Sentinel CDM loses context, needs an extension, or depends on another standard.

Risk

Machine-readable output may still be unfit for analysis or ML.

Test

Test the output for missing context, provenance, terminology alignment, time leakage, and the intended downstream decision. The distributed model supports reproducible safety features, but portability, labeling, site shift, privacy, and algorithm execution must follow Sentinel governance.

07

Official resources

Specifications, diagrams, examples, and guides from the organizations that maintain them.

  • Primary sourcePublic repository tag v8.2.2 · 2025-02-27

    Sentinel CDM v8.2.2 public repository tag

    Official publisher or steward guidance for this data model / schema profile.

    Publisher
    Sentinel Operations Center · FDA Sentinel Initiative
    Open official source

Next action

Put this profile in context

Compare its role with adjacent standards or place it inside an end-to-end data pathway before choosing an implementation.