Decision support

Compare standards by the job they do

Place up to three profiles side by side. Compare their architectural role, lifecycle reach, and first limitation to test. No single standard covers every layer.

Choose profiles

1 of 3 selected

BeaconStandard

Compare roles before choosing an implementation.

The useful question is not “Which standard wins?” It is “Which job must this part of the architecture perform, and what remains uncovered?”

  1. Start with the job

    Decide whether you need guidance, a domain payload, exchange, semantics, governance, or a reusable release.

  2. Map lifecycle reach

    Use the matrix to see where each profile has a direct role. A filled cell is coverage, not a quality score.

  3. Test the boundary

    Read what each option leaves unresolved before judging maturity or implementation fit.

Review lifecycle coverage and practical fit.

Read left to right. Lifecycle reach comes first; a maturity label never overrides a scope mismatch.

Where each profile contributes directly

Coverage shows a recorded role at that readiness stage. It does not imply end-to-end implementation.

Readiness-stage coverage for GA4GH Beacon
ProfilePlanAcquireHarmonizeExchangeLearn + reuse
BeaconStandardGA4GH Beacon has no direct role recorded in Plan.GA4GH Beacon has no direct role recorded in Acquire.GA4GH Beacon has no direct role recorded in Harmonize.GA4GH Beacon has a direct role in Exchange.GA4GH Beacon has a direct role in Learn + reuse.
Direct role recordedNo direct role recorded

What each option does not cover

These are design boundaries, not faults. Use them to identify the companion layers your architecture still needs.

Beacon

Stage boundary
No direct role is recorded for Plan, Acquire, Harmonize.
Known limitation
Beacon is a discovery protocol, not a complete authorization, consent, or privacy guarantee. Record-level and count responses can disclose sensitive information, and local schemas, filters, and handovers can still diverge.

Check the fit and source behind the map

Use the official source, version, and limitation together. A higher maturity label does not erase a scope mismatch.

Detailed comparison of GA4GH Beacon
AssessmentBeaconGA4GH Beacon
Purpose & coverage

Federated queries across genomic variants and related individuals, biosamples, cohorts, runs, analyses, filters, result granularity, and handover links.

Best fitPrivacy-aware discovery of relevant genomic and biomedical datasets before a researcher begins a separate authorization and access process.

Readiness stages
ExchangeLearn + reuse
AI-ready contributionSupports machine-driven cohort and dataset discovery, while returned matches do not by themselves establish access rights, harmonized records, cohort comparability, or fitness for training.
First limitation to testBeacon is a discovery protocol, not a complete authorization, consent, or privacy guarantee. Record-level and count responses can disclose sensitive information, and local schemas, filters, and handovers can still diverge.
Maturity

Scaling

Current v2 ecosystem with multiple implementations; v2.0 remains the last version recorded as PDAP-approved by GA4GH

Sources & links