Place up to three profiles side by side. Compare their architectural role, lifecycle reach, and first limitation to test. No single standard covers every layer.
Working set
Choose profiles
1 of 3 selected
01
FAIR DMMFramework
Decision lens
Compare roles before choosing an implementation.
The useful question is not “Which standard wins?” It is “Which job must this part of the architecture perform, and what remains uncovered?”
01
Start with the job
Decide whether you need guidance, a domain payload, exchange, semantics, governance, or a reusable release.
02
Map lifecycle reach
Use the matrix to see where each profile has a direct role. A filled cell is coverage, not a quality score.
03
Test the boundary
Read what each option leaves unresolved before judging maturity or implementation fit.
Assessment
Review lifecycle coverage and practical fit.
Read left to right. Lifecycle reach comes first; a maturity label never overrides a scope mismatch.
01 · Lifecycle reach
Where each profile contributes directly
Coverage shows a recorded role at that readiness stage. It does not imply end-to-end implementation.
Readiness-stage coverage for RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model
Reusable indicators, priorities, maturity levels, and evaluation guidance for assessing data and metadata against the FAIR principles.
Best fitUse as the evidence rubric that turns FAIR from an aspiration into a repeatable release and improvement assessment.
Readiness stages
PlanAcquireHarmonizeExchangeLearn + reuse
AI-ready contribution
Tests machine-actionability around identifiers, access, knowledge representation, licensing, provenance, and community standards, but not representativeness, label accuracy, privacy, or predictive fitness.
First limitation to test
It is not a certification, and locally adapted scoring or weighting means totals from different assessment tools are not automatically comparable.
Maturity
Established
Endorsed RDA Recommendation; implementations may adapt indicators and scoring